|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph began his career at MGM, coming up through the ranks and learning his craft assisting older, more experienced editors. After sound came in, silent versions of the films were made for the theaters that were not yet equipped with sound. Ralph edited many of those silent versions, cutting in title cards and learning all the time.
While working as an editor, Ralph found the time to actively support the union. He was on our Board of Directors for twenty years.
He saw us struggle and grow, and then watched as a large pool of non-union labor started to form in the 70's and 80's. Many of these people were kept out by union restrictions. This, he believed, was a big mistake, and he happily watched as those restrictions ended. When a group of young assistants circulated a petition to allow members to become editors after five, rather than eight years, Ralph seconded the motion at a General Membership Meeting to applause from some young enough to be his grandchildren.
Ralph believes it is vital for editors to support and help their assistants. He has watched the salaries of picture editors, now represented by powerful agents, rise to unimagined heights, yet sees that many will not raise their voices to get their first assistant a few more dollars a week. He told how Blake Edwards, for whom Ralph cut many films, went to bat for him at Warner Bros. when he wanted an extra $50 a week. This was the era before agents represented editors. Edwards encouraged him to stand up to the producer.
"When somebody wants you," Ralph says, "that's the only club you have. Whatever these guys are making today, they still have to have a club. They have to have a director that wants them and is willing to go to bat for them. And many directors and producers do go to bat for their editors. Whereas the editor often does not go to bat for his assistant. And I think that's wrong." Of course, the assistant must speak up and let the editor know what his needs are. He must stand up for himself.
Ralph sees the changes in our industry producing both positive and negative results in the search for excellence that we all strive for. "I think the young directors and producers have come along so fast that they accept less than the best in editing. Because they don't know the best. Because of their lack of knowledge. Of course, these schedules today are shocking. It's hard to do good work." He adds, however, that "Sometimes if a bad cut gets 50 feet of bad film out, then it's not a bad cut. It's a good cut."
Ralph believes one of the most insidious changes is the greed that pervades the huge conglomerates that now own the studios. Though the movie industry has always been a business, Ralph points out that "in the old days, your Mayers and your Laemmles and the old time directors grew up with the film. And they loved film. Today they love money."
In spite of this, he thinks it's still a great time to be an editor. We have a lot more standing today than ever before. With more money comes more respect and a recognition of how important editing is. With the possibility of endless manipulation of images during post-production, the importance of the editor increases tremendously. "We, as a group," says Ralph, "have to help to make every picture ever made as good as it possibly can be. When you go in to work on a movie that's what your thinking should be. You've got to work on every film as if it's the greatest thing you've ever worked on in your life."
Ralph Winters and all our members are ready to apply 75 years of storytelling through editing to any film, television show, CD-ROM, or any other medium that comes along.