|
When Avid released the Media Composer and Symphony
v.11.8 [for Mac] and v.11.5 [for Windows] systems, we introduced a
23.976 project type. With this capability,
editors are able to choose which frame rate to
work in when starting new projects – a decision based on In the beginning… The Avid Media Composer system was originally designed for use on television shows, editing at NTSC rates of 29.97 in order to create an online EDL and use matchback to create the negative cultists required. The Avid Film Composer system, introduced in 1992, grew out of this initial design – creating an NTSC-based editing system that could work at a true film rate of 24fps. To support the double system workflow used in feature film, it was necessary to create a true 24fps environment. This allowed audio dailies from the set to be directly captured into the Film Composer and remain in sync with the picture. This capability became a requirement when audio recording moved to digital formats such as DAT. Productions wanting to maintain a pure digital pipeline for audio needed to capture as AES/EBU with no sample rate conversion in order to maintain the highest quality. Audio sample rate and digital audio workflow are the main decision drivers of working at 23.976 or 24 in the Avid. The first question to ask … When deciding which project type to create, first answer this question: “What is the picture frame rate that is in sync with 48kHz?” When you discover that, there will be no need to do a sample rate conversion or digitize via analog sources to change the sample rate of the incoming audio signal. Three commonly used workflows, as well as a fourth that is growing in popularity with the availability of hard disk recorders and the BWF file format, provide a good means for identifying all of the considerations.
1. 1. Feature Film Double System Most, if not all, feature film production intended for theatrical shoots film at 24fps while recording audio digitally at 48kHz. This workflow has been supported by the Avid Film Composer since 1992. Because the audio elements tend to move to audio post via OMF, capturing the production audio digitally and at the highest quality and digitally is a requirement. Picture: The camera negative is transferred
to video directly or from a workprint, but the
film is not running at 23.976fps during the telecine
process in order to create a known 2:3 pulldown
cadence to the 29.97fps video rate. Once digitized
into the Avid in a 24p project, the frames
are “stamped” as 24fps in order to play back in sync with
audio captured directly via AES/EBU or Broadcast
WAV files recorded at 48kHz. 2. Film-Based Television with Sync Dailies Due to the tight schedules in television programming, dailies are already synced when delivered to the editing room. The transfer facility has already resolved the original shooting rate of 24fps to 23.976 and has sample-rate-converted the digital audio sources to be in sync in the DigiBeta source tapes. Because DigiBeta expects only 48 kHz for 29.97 NTSC, the audio must be sample rate converted when going from 24fps to 23.976 on the video. The path looks like this: Picture: 24 -> 23.976 to 29.97 video creating
2:3 pulldown The edit room now gets digital audio from their
DigiBeta for capture into the editing system.
If the editors are cutting in a 30i project
(29.97 NTSC video), the audio sample rate is unchanged
when capturing – it
is a digital clone. 3. Film or HD Production at 23.976 Film cameras have been able to shoot at 23.976fps for many years,
but it was not until HD acquisition became popular that people started
using the frame rate regularly in 4. Feature Film with 48.048kHz Audio Recording Even though film cameras can run at 23.976, using them in that way
never caught on for a variety of reasons. However, the audio workflow
can change to allow a 23.976 The same can be done during the film-to-tape process from DAT or BWF recorded at 48.048kHz to create sync digital dailies directly to disc via a MediaStation or directly to a DigiBeta tape. Capture, Edit, Digital Cut The Avid Media Composer, Symphony and upcoming release of Media Composer Adrenaline systems, address 23.976 in three areas; during capture, during editing and playback from the timeline, and during the digital cut process back to tape. Capture: The project type determines the native capture rate of the
project, either 23.976 or 24p. It also determines the Edit: In the Film/24p settings you will see
the “Edit Play Rate” as
either 23.976 or 24. This control sets the play
rate of the timeline. It does not affect any
of the digital cut Digital Cut: Here you can output the timeline as 23.976, 24, or 29.97. The important thing to remember is that this is the playback speed of the Avid timeline, not the source tape destination. The NTSC frame rate of 29.97 cannot be changed. What is changing is the frame rate of the picture within the NTSC signal. 1. 23.976. This creates a continuous 2:3 cadence from 2. 24: This is used for feature film production to create a true “film projected” speed from an Avid timeline on NTSC video. It is also the output type to use when using picture reference in a Digidesign Pro Tools system using OMF media from a 24p project type. Note that this is not a continuous 2:3 cadence. Adjustments are made over 1000 frames with the pulldown cadence. No frames are dropped, just the field ordering with the 2:3 cadence. 3. 29.97: Timeline will play back 25% faster to create a 1:1 film
frame to video frame relationship. This can be considered a 2:2:2:2
pulldown cadence. This The above workflows are intended to maintain a digital audio pipeline from capture through post and into the final mix. It is possible to cross frame rates with sample rates using analog capture instead of digital or using a digital audio sample rate converter at time of capture. Michael Phillips is the principal product designer at Avid Technology, Inc. He can be reached by E-mail at Michael_Phillips@avid.com .
But now, a new generation of digital audio recorders is coming onto the market. These machines record six, eight or even ten tracks onto a non-linear recording medium — either a magnetic or optical disk. They promise to streamline our audio workflow, simplify audio post production and finally bring easy-to-use digital audio into the picture editing room. We recently completed a feature using one of these machines, the Fostex PD-6, along with its companion studio model, the DV40. They record six tracks of audio onto DVD-RAM disks. In this article we’ll discuss our experiences, pro and con, and talk about the specific procedures we employed. (For a production-oriented look at this technology see Chris Munro’s article in the last issue.)
Overview We used the Fostex machines primarily because they were available and seemed to fit our purposes. We found them to be capable, reliable and simple to operate in a cutting room environment — but we did not directly compare them to machines from other manufacturers, namely Zaxcom/Deva, HHB and Aaton. The PD-6 records directly onto small, 8-cm, DVD-RAM disks that reside in a protective cartridge (Figure 1). The disk works in the Fostex machines and in computer DVD-RAM drives (we used a FireWire version from LaCie). It can also be read (but not recorded) with a conventional DVD-ROM drive. The PD-6 records six tracks simultaneously as a pair of Broadcast Wave files. (These are “BWF” files, labeled with the filename suffix “wav.” The system can record in other formats, as well.) At the same time, it can create an ALE file that serves as a machine-readable sound report. It records in either of two configurations: “4+2,” where one file contains four tracks and the other two, or “5+1,” where one file contains five tracks and the other is monophonic. (Multi-track files are known as “polyphonic,” which means that a single file contains many tracks.) The idea is that the mixer records four or five tracks that represent separate microphones, and one or two tracks as a mix appropriate for the picture editing department and the screening of dailies. We used the 4+2 format because Media Composers prior to Adrenaline can’t handle more than four tracks per clip, so audio containing five tracks would have been broken into two clips. This logical separation of material is a powerful reason to use this system. The production mixer can give the picture department an appropriate mix that will work for editing and screening. And the sound department can still have access to all the separated tracks and use them in the final. But it means that sound editors will inevitably do more work, if only because they have much more raw material to deal with.
Audio files are imported into the Avid via a few
simple commands. This is another advantage in using
these machines — no
digitizing required, D-to-D quality and much faster than real-time import.
The picture assistant then synchs dailies in the Avid. If he or she
uses Avid’s Slip by Perfs function, then sync is as good as or
better than traditional mag synching.
Turnover is done via OMF and/or EDL. With modern Avid and Pro Tools systems, OMF turnover finally makes it possible for all the audio work that the picture editor does, including volume graphing and equalization, to find its way to the sound department. We found this process to be effective, powerful and easy to use, once we’d learned the necessary procedures. The Process
Problems The process described above worked very well for us, providing perfect audio quality with few headaches. But we did encounter some glitches. We found that it’s essential that the production recordist be completely familiar with the PD-6. In particular, he or she should know how to rename files, how to delete files (and recover deleted files when necessary), how to create an ALE, how to format a disk and how to back it up. A standard backup routine should be worked out and reviewed with post production. These are all operations that would never occur when working with a typical DAT machine, but they are essential parts of the day-to-day use of any digital disk recorder.
Second, it’s important to use the right kind of DVD-RAM disks and to format them properly. We successfully used disks from Maxell, HHB and Optodisk. Disks from Memorex consistently failed for us. The disks must be formatted in the “Universal Disk Format.” This can be done under Mac OS 9 or OS X or with the PD-6 itself. Disks formatted with the normal Macintosh Hierarchical File System won’t be readable on the DV40. It’s also important to note that DVD-RAM disks are available with or without the protective cartridges that the PD-6 and DV40 expect. At the time of this writing DVD-RAM disks aren’t in wide distribution and can be difficult to find, especially on distant locations. Consider purchasing them before you leave the U.S. We were only able to read 17 file names (i.e. 17 reels) on one side of a disk with the DV40. Fostex tells us that if we formatted our disks on the DV40 and put our files into a folder called “BWF” we would not have encountered this limitation. We also found that some long-standing Avid bugs caused problems with this process. In particular, when we turned over to sound some of the timecodes in the audio timecode column had disappeared, making it impossible for us to create accurate EDLs. These timecodes had to be found and filled in by hand. We’ve seen this bug before — as long ago as the early nineties. Our workaround was to use the start timecode instead of the audio timecode to make audio EDLs. In addition to disappearing timecodes, some clips acquired erroneous timecodes. The production recordist typically uses hour 1 for the first side of a disk and hour 2 for the second side. When we turned over, we found some clips labeled with hour 0. Again, we fixed these clips by hand using the production ALE files. For this reason, it’s essential that all imported audio clips be checked against the ALE files after loading to make sure that they have accurate timecode information. We found that the process of synching by numbers to be relatively straightforward. But it became awkward when we found sync errors on the KEM. The assistant has to figure out the problem, go back to the Avid and create a new file on the DVD-RAM disk. This takes too much time. It also means that the new file will appear out of screening order on the disk, so the projectionist could have trouble finding it. Turnover
We encountered some confusion during turnover, primarily because every audio file used in editing has an associated multi-track file, and it was essential for the sound editors to find and listen to them so that the best options could be presented in the mix. Our sound editors evaluated two systems for doing this. They rebuilt our dialogue using EDLs with SynchroArts’ Titan software, creating sequences with four new tracks for every cut we had created in the Avid. They also tried MetaFlow, a new tool from Gallery that uses OMF to precisely link the original editor’s tracks to the associated unmixed tracks, without any of the inaccuracies normally associated with EDLs. Titan won out on our show, but we know of other productions that have successfully worked with MetaFlow. Either way, the sound editors referred to a complete OMF copy of our tracks with all the audio work that we created: volume graphing, audio effects, etc. Conclusion From the editor’s perspective, this technology offers many advantages, including perfect digital audio in the Avid and in the screening room, excellent sync with accuracy equal to or better than mag and digital turnover with all work intact. The editor cuts with a simple, mixed track, but when there are problems with the mix, he or she can dip into the separated tracks, which reside in their own bin, and use them as needed. The sound editors work with the separated production tracks and aren’t limited to tracks that were designed to sound good in dailies screenings. No mag film is generated, no money is wasted on it, and it doesn’t end up in a landfill somewhere. However, there is one issue we found that is part and parcel of this and other digital workflows: it means extra work for the Avid assistant. In a mag-based feature editing room, all the synching would be accomplished by the film assistants. But with a workflow like this one, much of that effort gets transferred to the person working on the Avid. Two improvements might help. First, if a lower cost, laptop-based Avid system could be used for synching, then that work could be tackled by the film assistants and kept out of the Avid assistant’s domain. We did not try to use Avid Xpress Pro for this purpose, but it would be something we’d look into in the future. Second, it would be much easier to check sync and fix sync problems if an Avid could chase picture playing on a KEM. This is not currently possible, but Avid might incorporate this functionality in a future release. In general, we found this system to be extremely usable in an editing environment, and its many advantages far outweigh the glitches that we encountered. Neither of us would ever want to work with mag film again. Digital disk recording has arrived and, in our view, there is no going back. |